1
min read
A- A+
read

Understanding Research Evidence Reviews: Systematic Approaches and Literature Summaries

Systematic Reviews:

  • Approach: Structured and rigorous synthesis with defined methodologies.
  • Meta-Analysis: May or may not include statistical synthesis for quantitative estimate.
  • Steps: Define research question, search strategy, screening, data extraction, synthesis, reporting.
  • Publication Bias Consideration: Aims to reduce bias by including all relevant studies.

Meta-Analysis:

  • Purpose: Quantitative estimation of effect size across studies.
  • Heterogeneity Assessment: Examines variations among studies for pooling data.
  • Statistical Pooling: Combining data for an overall effect size estimate.
  • Common Usage: Often used in systematic reviews but not mandatory.

Literature Reviews:

  • Types: Narrative, scoping, systematic, integrative, umbrella.
  • Synthesis Methods: Focus on summarizing and describing existing literature without statistical analysis.
  • Overview: Summary of existing literature lacking the systematic approach of systematic reviews.

Types of Research Evidence Reviews by Rigor:

  • Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review without Meta-Analysis
  • Integrative Review
  • Narrative Review

This structured flow outlines the methodologies, approaches, and types within research evidence reviews, providing a clear differentiation between systematic reviews, meta-analyses, literature reviews, and their variations.